Apr 14
If you’ve been looking to get into the Mac market, but don’t want to pay the Jobs Tax (read: actually pay a reasonable price to get quality hardware) then Psystar has come to the rescue… sorta. That white box to the left (also available in Black) is what’s called the OpenMac. It is a product of the underground movement called OSX86 which was formed when Apple announced its move to Intel-based processors. It is, for all intents and purposes, a Mac inside. It uses most of the same components, which are generally available Intel parts, to mimic the hardware architecture of most mow to midrange Macintosh systems.
So, why “sorta”? Because its not really a Mac. Sure, you can install Mac OS X on it without having to use an illegally hacked copy, but because it [uses an EFI emulator] so its not compatible with some hardware updates. In other words, this isn’t your grandpa’s Mac. If you’re into minivans, being a soccer mom, cruise the web for the latest investment ideas, or relish the idea of more pictures of your neighbor’s litter of kittens, this system likely isn’t for you. If, however, you hack kernels before breakfast, slipstream ISOs in your sleep, or can name at least 20 Apple project codenames without pausing, then you should investigate this US$399 little creature. [Editor's Note: The last time I checked, the site was available. -.Ed]
written by Tyler Regas
Jan 14
Now that all the fanbois are out in force, the image gallerys are starting to get pimped. I’ll start with one from Italian blog, setteB.it, who actually got inside the Moscone Center and snapped some useless shots. I seriously doubt there’s any secret gear in the shrouded-in-mystery Apple booth, anyway. Next up is a small series from Mac|Life editor, Roberto Baldwin. He’s funny. In this set we get to see the architectural side of Engadget, which kind of makes the Moscone Center look like street sets in the Beeb’s The Avengers. MacNN has a few of the Italian’s images and some of their own? Gizmodo doesn’t have anything, but here’s an interesting rant from Brian Lam defending their prank using TV-B-Gone clickers at CES 2008.
[Editorial side note: Brian, all of the failures of the press you mention are valid and true, yet what Gizmodo did was wrong, and its irresponsible of Gizmodo to compare the two. Secretly slinking around CES and turning off TVs to satisfy your juvenile need for attention is merely an expression of a lack of maturity, not journalism. Your thinking is flawed if you believe that you are delivering news to the consumer at the same time you are railing against big business. It is the mere existence of these corporations that create what your site requires to exist. That's not pandering or being bought out. Its just news. I've been doing this for no profit for 7 years now. I get review samples here and then, but have never been offered a trip, yet getting gear or taking a flight will not change my opinions. That's what is behind integrity, not the ability to prank TVs at CES. -Ed.]
written by Tyler Regas
Recent Comments